South African retail assemble Steinhoff is to purchase Poundland for more than £610m after shareholders in the rebate retailer affirmed the arrangement, regardless of an intercession by fence stock investments Elliott Advisors.
Very nearly 98% of votes were thrown for the arrangement at a meeting of Poundland shareholders, with 79% of shareholders voting.
The vote implies Steinhoff is ready to at last finish a takeover of a British-recorded retailer, after its endeavors to purchase Home Retail Group, the proprietor of Argos, and Darty, the French electrical retailer, were rebuked.
Steinhoff is supported by Christo Wiese, the Southhttp://www.justluxe.com/community/view-profile.php?p_id=42694 African retail extremely rich person, who has freely expressed his aspiration to extend his interests in Britain. Steinhoff as of now claims furniture chains Harveys and Bensons for Beds in the UK.
Steinhoff's takeover of Poundland was tossed into uncertainty when forceful US fence stock investments Elliott, which was a financial specialist in electrical retailer Comet before it given way, developed a stake of very nearly 25% in the rebate chain.
This prompted Steinhoff expanding its offer from 222p for every offer to 227p for every offer, including a profit.
It is comprehended that Elliott voted for the arrangement. The multifaceted investments is evaluated to have made a benefit of in any event £3m.
The offer cost speaks to a premium of 43% to the Poundland offer cost before news of Steinhoff's advantage rose.
In any case, it is well beneath the 300p for every offer that Poundland drifted at two years prior. The organization has battled since purchasing rival chain 99p Stores and discovering it in a more awful state than anticipated. It is additionally under developing weight from other rebate retailers, for example, B&M, and from a value war among the "enormous four" market chains, Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda and Morrisons.
Steinhoff's takeover of Poundland is presently booked to be lawfully finished on 16 September. It has as of now been affirmed by the European commission.
The conclusion of Fabric, one Britain's best known dance club, has incited caution about the eventual fate of the clubbing scene and worries that it is being driven underground as chambers endeavor to gentrify their territories.
In the early hours of Wednesday morning, Islington committee chose to deny Fabric's permit after an audit incited by the medication related passings of two 18-year-old supporters inside nine weeks this late spring. In a choice sponsored by the Metropolitan police, it asserted ventures of individuals entering the club and supervision inside was lacking, disregarding dissents by driving move music figures and a 150,000-in number appeal requesting the venue be spared.
Supporters promised to seek after legitimate and political streets to keep it open and there was judgment from over the political range, from the author Irvine Welsh to the conservative research organization the Adam Smith Institute, and in addition from medication security campaigners.
More than half of London's clubs have shut in the most recent eight years, as per the London leader, Sadiq Khan, who said this decay needed to stop "if London is to hold its status as a 24-hour city with a world-class nightlife".
Welsh, whose books including Trainspotting and Ecstasy chronicled the medication and clubbing scene in the 1990s, said the conclusion of Fabric was the "start of the end of our urban communities as social focuses, and to be sure as diversion focuses in the customary sense".
He said worries in regards to medications were being utilized as an affection to close clubs, asserting Fabric was the "slightest druggy club in London".
He told the Guardian: "It's about property advancement. In the age of neoliberalism and corporate elites, amusement is being privatized, and will progressively happen with gated groups, claimed and leased by to a great extent remote financial specialists.
"The urban areas should be kept as sterile and pleasant as would be prudent for the new abroad proprietors of them, who can then get destroyed away from plain view or in the smaller than expected club offices incorporated with their loft buildings."
Welsh proposed that future clubbing would happen in shanty towns. "The makeshift camps and stopgap groups that will experience childhood with the edges of urban communities, as in the creating scene, will be the spots to go for an appropriate gathering," he said.
Welsh's remarks were resounded by the editorial manager of Mixmag, Duncan Dick.
"Clubs end up in an impeccable tempest of gentrification and advancement," he said. "In spite of the fact that clubs offer gigantic social advantages to the range, are what makes a city, give a city its character, property is top dog."
He contrasted the predicament of Fabric with that of the Glasgow superclub the Arches, which shut a year ago, where he said a lavish lodging was being created. Dick guaranteed that more individuals had kicked the bucket from medications at a fast food eatery around the bend from the Arches but then the club was scapegoated.
While there has been a blast in move music celebrations, Dick said clubs were the place "DJs cut their teeth and new sorts like dubstep rise".
He included: "There's a lot of individuals moving and making music yet it will move farther as the designers push them out. Perhaps in 20 years the clubbing hotspot will be Luton. You're not going to stop individuals needing to go out and move yet at this moment it's looking as though London's case to be the focal point of nightlife on the planet is being disintegrated."
The DJ Goldie undermined to soften down his MBE in dissent at the conclusion. Goldie, whose genuine name is Clifford Joseph Price, told Channel 4 News on Wednesday: "This nation was based on being distinctive and being out there musically and from a masterful perspective.
"I'm pondering regardless of whether any semblance of me, any semblance of Jazzie B, Norman Jay, Pete Tong so far as that is concerned, ought to simply exchange our MBEs in, melt them down and place them in a pencil-pusher's espresso, so it can taste a tiny bit sweeter for him today, so he feels more effective in killing counter-culture and culture itself."
Drugs philanthropies cautioned that end Fabric would really expand the danger for clubbers by moving them into unregulated situations.
Danny Kushlick, executive of Transform, said: "It's a catastrophe. The fact of the matter is, if there was some dangerous medication taking going ahead there then you toss hurt lessening administrations at it. This is a since a long time ago settled rule since we presented needle trades, free condoms. This choice goes against all our experience of managing medication use."
He faulted the gathering's choice for the disappointment of the permitting procedure to organize general wellbeing.
Katy McLeod, executive of Chill Welfare, a social undertaking committed to keeping clubbers safe, recommended the late passings at Fabric were prone to be connected to the rise of high-quality happiness pills instead of any administration failings.
"Fabric was presumably one of the best quality level clubs in that they had consciousness of medication issues," she said. "Individuals will [instead] go to local gatherings, underground raves, that have no authorizing, drug approaches.
"Soon after the Arches shut, there was a bunch of passings. There was insight to propose a number of them weren't in club settings; they were in local gathering settings."
McLeod cautioned that making seeks more stringent was not as a matter of course the answer as it only empowered "pre-stacking" – individuals taking every one of their medications in one go before entering the club.
Sam Bowman, the official chief of the Adam Smith Institute, said the choice to repudiate Fabric's permit was a disfavor.
He said: "The goal ought to be to diminish damage to medication clients and the best approach to do that is to tell them what they're utilizing. That implies testing drugs that are flowing in clubs and cautioning drug clients if possibly hazardous clumps are around – a plan that has been steered by a few clubs previously."
London's leader, who unsuccessfully crusaded to keep Fabric open, yielded that means should have been taken to guarantee that clubbing was protected. Khan said: "The issues https://audioboom.com/z4rootapkme confronted by Fabric point to a more extensive issue of how we secure London's evening economy, while guaranteeing it is protected and pleasant for everybody."
He affirmed arrangements to designate a "night tsar" demonstrated on Amsterdam's "night chairman" to accomplish more to advance and secure London's nightlife, including clubs and venues.
Khan said: "No single association or open body can take care of these issues alone – we as a whole need to cooperate to guarantee London flourishes as a 24-hour city, in a way that is protected and pleasant for everyone."
The club's proprietors incidentally closed the venue in August to permit an examination to happen after the demise of the second youngster, who fallen outside the venue. The other kicked the bucket after he fell sick inside the venue in late June. The club said it had worked without episode in the past two years.
Reacting to the board's choice, the proprietors said: "Shutting Fabric is not the response to the medication related issues clubs like our own are attempting to avoid and sets a disturbing point of reference for the eventual fate of London's evening time economy."
An Islington gathering representative said: "The choice of Islington chamber's permitting board of trustees on Fabric's permit was construct exclusively with respect to the confirmation, entries and representations put before the advisory group.
"To recommend whatever else is basically off-base. For the evasion of uncertainty, Islington gathering is not the proprietor of the building and has no budgetary enthusiasm for the site."
Jeremy Corbyn trusts Britain ought to reject key parts of the single business sector when it leaves the European Union, he has clarified, starting a new line with some of his gathering's MPs.
In a preparation after PM's inquiries, a senior Labor source said Corbyn needed to discard a portion of the principles which other part nations see as necessary parts of the single business sector – including confinements on when governments can salvage coming up short organizations.
"There's an inquiry regarding what 'participation of the single business sector' really implies," the source said. "It's frequently deciphered as the entire accumulation of arrangements and orders around the four essential mainstays of the EU: unhindered commerce in products, administrations, work et cetera. There are parts of that which Jeremy crusaded against in the submission battle."
After various Labor MPs asked Corbyn to clear up his position, he discharged an individual proclamation. He said he would press "for full access to the European single business sector" for Britain's organizations, yet included: "There are orders and commitments connected to the single business sector, for example, state help standards and prerequisites to change and privatize open administrations, which we would not have any desire to see as a major aspect of a post-Brexit relationship."
Work sources demanded Corbyn's position was reliable with shadow chancellor John McDonnell's case in the outcome of the Brexit vote that "the harm that would be done to our economy by hauling out of the single business sector right now could be significant".
In any case, other EU part states might be unwilling to permit Britain to carefully select the parts of single business sector enrollment they like, while dismissing some of its key principles.
Having "access" to the single business sector, without outstanding a part, has additionally been mooted by some star Brexit campaigners.
Be that as it may, the Brexit secretary, David Davis, was slapped around the executive not long ago to suggest it was "implausible" Britain would remain a part.
Some Labor MPs were frightened by Corbyn's comments, which they dreaded recommended he would acknowledge a "hard Brexit" – including leaving the single business sector – which some foresee would extremely harm the economy.
Authority challenger Owen Smith, the MP for Pontypridd, said: "Jeremy appears to be glad to acknowledge Brexit at any expense – regardless of the possibility that that implies putting British employments and venture at danger.
"Maybe this discloses why he neglected to solicit a solitary inquiry from Theresa May at head administrator's inquiries concerning Brexit, and why he neglected to battle sufficiently hard amid the choice."
Scottish Labor pioneer Kezia Dugdale kept in touch with the main pastor Nicola Sturgeon to stretch that: "Scottish Labor is an independent gathering. We have over and over bolstered your endeavors to meet with governments around the globe to not just try to figure out how to hold our EU participation, additionally to clarify that Scotland stays open for business."
What's more, unmistakable Labor backbencher Chuka Ummuna said: "Working individuals the length and broadness of Britain advantage colossally from Britain's place in the European single business sector. Work ought to battle for Britain to stay in the single business sector, not turning a visually impaired eye to its points of interest."
Corbyn has for some time been a commentator of the EU. His battling for Britain to remain a part was considered by a few MPs to be tepid – a key element in driving the mass abdications that took after the submission result.
However, his partners see Brexit as a chance to free Britain from what Corbyn, in his reaction to an announcement on Brexit from the leader, called "free market doctrine".
May seized on his words, recommending Labor had moved in the opposite direction of facilitated commerce, styling post-Brexit Britain as a champion of globalization.
After "the gulag" – the name Shirebrook local people use to depict the Sports Direct distribution center – came glasnost.
That was the message from Sports Direct as the troubled retailer held its tremendously proclaimed "open day" amid its yearly shareholder meeting on Wednesday, when it treated financial specialists and the media to a visit around its Shirebrook distribution center, which had been differently contrasted with something out of Dickens or a Soviet work camp.
This was all a player in the most recent PR battle by the sportswear retailer to restore a picture destroyed by a progression of outrages identifying with working conditions at its station, which incited the distribution on Tuesday of an inside report into where the organization had turned out badly.
A portion of the report's discoveries made uncomfortable perusing for the board, which was compelled to apologize for "genuine inadequacies". Yet, the record was charged as framing the premise of a gathered new time of genuineness from the organization, before financial specialists were begun to see with their own eyes.
The appear, be that as it may, was a mistake. This was not a voyage through the colossal, clamoring, Shirebrook distribution center where Guardian covert columnists uncovered a year ago how the organization had violated the law by paying its laborers not exactly the national the lowest pay permitted by law.
Rather, the horde of around 120 onlookers, all wearing splendid yellow hello there vis coats, were appeared around Sports Direct's open new office, sparkling white dividers what not. It even noticed new and naturally painted – meaning it was enticing to presume that shareholders were really seeing a whitewash at the workhouse.
Regardless of the promises of another straightforwardness, the observers scarcely saw any of Sports Direct's 4,000 stockroom laborers (had they been abrogated alongside the "six strikes and you're out" approach?). What's more, when specialists were recognized, the guests were isolated from them by a line of vast Sports Direct security staff. Not that that mattered. The individuals who got through reported that the laborers were consistent: Shirebrook was really a marvelous work environment.
On the off chance that that felt abnormal, there were other particular contrasts, as well.
The tannoy – which when the Guardian and Channel 4 had gone by a year ago once in a while lectured staff – never yapped any requests by any means, either in English or Polish.
In the interim, the main individual who was put through a security hunt was the extremely rich person organizer, Mike Ashley. He exhausted his pockets and out popped a tremendous wad of notes.
"All that you will see today was not really working 15 months prior," said Ashley – in what may have been seen as another jab at his scapegoated CEO, Dave Forsey – before he quickly came back to his most loved point that the "sheer scale and size" of his distribution centers implied it was inescapable he would commit errors.
The new distribution center, which is around the http://z4rootapkme.blogdigy.com/z4root-apk-2013-download-samsung-samsung-galaxy-s-plus-review-449810 same size as its questionable neighbor, is so greetings tech that it will soon be fitted with a transport line to "enhance the rate at which requests can be picked".
"This will massively speed it up," enthused the supervisor, as though he had unearthed a startling mechanical disclosure. "It's not accessible in the old distribution center."
All things considered, very. There, covert columnists found a year ago that packers were strolling near 20 miles on every eight-hour shift.
Numerous whined that the work they were being requested that do was difficult to fit into the time span organization supervisors permitted them. Aside from the odd handheld scanner, the most exceptional bit of innovation on offer to numerous appeared to be a ballpoint pen.
In any case, if the sparkling new stockroom should speak to a look at the glossy new Sports Direct, splits did here and there show up.
Ashley, who had prior totally lost his temper with Unite's right hand general secretary, Steve Turner, after the exchange unionist had the nerve to pose a question, appeared to be ceaselessly battling to hold his genuine feelings under wraps.
He demanded he had gone about when he had perused the Guardian's reports that the organization was neglecting to pay the national the lowest pay permitted by law, after staff were held unpaid toward the end of movements to be sought.
This was clearly wrong, he included, yet then gave the impression of being fairly angered that his organization's lawful breaks had been uncovered.
"He's not my most loved individual, the Guardian man," he told his group. "Where is he?"
The inquiry was later more adept in converse, when Ashley disappeared for 60 minutes from the inquiry and-answer session, pretty much as it was developing that a larger part of free shareholders had voted against the reappointment of Keith Hellawell as administrator.
The soul of openness did not stretch out to giving an explanation behind his nonappearance, albeit even Ashley's harshest faultfinders may battle to blame him for covering up. The extremely rich person, once depicted as the UK's response to the hermitic Howard Hughes, was giving an uncommon TV meeting.
The scholars of the BBC1 dramatization One of Us have safeguarded their delineation of a character with Parkinson's infection after viewers protested his depiction of the sickness as terminal.
The BBC said it would not uncover the quantity of grievances got about the most recent scene of the mental show. It is comprehended that viewers likewise disagreed with different routes in which Parkinson's was talked about.
The project's makers and essayists Jack and Harry Williams said the way the character Bill Douglas, played by John Lynch, discussed the infection mirrored his own particular experience.
In an announcement, they said: "One of Us is an anecdotal show arrangement and the way Bill discusses his Parkinson's is an intentional decision – he sees it as a capital punishment, a conclusion to his lifestyle and feeling of self.
"He utilizes the hyperbolic dialect to stun and rebuff his child. This amazing conduct is necessary to the plot of the last scene."
The scene, the third in a four-section arrangement, was viewed by 3.7 million individuals.
Barbara Williams, executive of backing and neighborhood systems at Parkinson's UK, said the media had a duty to guarantee the general population were not deceived.
She said: "Parkinson's is a complex neurological condition influencing around 127,000 individuals in the UK. We know from our own particular examination and what individuals enlighten us concerning their encounters of living with Parkinson's that confusions about the condition can devastatingly affect individuals' enthusiastic and mental prosperity, so it is key that data general society gets about the condition is right.
"The media have an immensely essential part to play in dispersing accurate data about Parkinson's and an obligation to ensure that general society are not deceived. We would encourage anybody talking about Parkinson's freely to check the realities in the first place, with a specific end goal to depict the condition precisely."
The center of the official investigation into kid sexual misuse won't be contracted to avoid verifiable cases, the home secretary has clarified, as she likewise proposed that its previous seat, Dame Lowell Goddard, may have stopped on the grounds that she was forlorn.
Golden Rudd rejected cases by Goddard, who quit as seat a month ago, that the request was excessively aggressive in scale and underfunded for the errand it had been set.
The home secretary proposed that Goddard, a New Zealand high court judge and the third seat of the request to leave, had surrendered in light of the fact that "it was a lot for her" and on the grounds that she was forlorn.
"I think she went … in light of the fact that she discovered it a lot for her, and despite the fact that she could add to it and there was some great work done in the previous year, at last she discovered it too desolate," Rudd said. "She was far from home and she chose to venture down."
Rudd affirmed to the Commons home undertakings select panel that the kid sexual misuse request had reimbursed the Home Office £2.5m of its spending a year ago due to underspending, and recommended that Goddard had distorted the financing issue.
Goddard declined to show up before MPs to clarify her sudden abdication and rather sent a 10-page investigate in which she guaranteed the request was confronting an unmanageable and unthinkable assignment. She proposed its terms of reference ought to be refocused to focus on present kid sexual misuse and the lessons for what's to come.
Yet, the home secretary said she could see "no innate issue" with the scale and extent of the request, which incorporates looking at youngster sexual misuse cases backtracking up to 60 years. Rudd demanded that it was vital to comprehend past cases, however long prior, with a specific end goal to hit the nail on the head for what's to come.
Rudd concurred that she would reestablish the solicitation for Goddard to offer proof to the advisory group by video join from New Zealand when she examines with her the last subtle elements of the high court judge's last bundle.
The interval board of trustees director, Tim Loughton, said there had been proposals that Goddard ought to discount a portion of the £500,000-a-year pay and costs bundle that had been concurred when she was named by the past home secretary, Theresa May.
Rudd told MPs that she had met survivors' gatherings before declaring the new administrator, Prof Alexis Jay, one the request's board individuals, and said they "to a great extent" bolstered her arrangement.
England's economy could even now head into subsidence after it extended a month ago at a large portion of the rate seen before the Brexit vote, as indicated by information aggregated by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
Gross domestic product development extended by 0.3% in the three months finishing in August, contrasted and 0.6% in the second quarter of 2016.
NIESR said its month to month assessment was lower than the 0.4 % development rate in the three months finishing in July.
"For the year to date, monetary development in the UK has been repressed contrasted with late history and the economy has been level since April," it said. "Given this, the emotional log jam implied the likelihood of a specialized subsidence before the end of 2017 remains fundamentally raised."
A month ago, the research organization estimate "a checked monetary log jam in the second 50% of this current year and all through 2017", with "an even risk of a specialized subsidence in the following year and a half".
Rebecca Piggott, research individual at NIESR, said the proof on the ebb and flow condition of the economy post-submission was restricted, "however on equalization these information propose that the UK economy is amidst a lull".
Brexit is a major "prize" for the angling business and will empower it to end up a world-driving fish exporter like Norway, the House of Lords has been told.
Withdrawal from the EU would empower Britain to recover control of its waters following quite a while of "normal brushing" rights relegated to European neighbors, angling pioneers said.
Bertie Armstrong, CEO of the Scottish Fisherman's Federation, said the choice result was incredible news for his industry. It denoted the primary genuine open door since quantities were forced in 1983 to come back to "being a world pioneer in reasonable fish", he said.
Armstrong said the British angling industry might http://www.weddingchicago.com/member/77732/ want to copy Norway, which is the world's driving maker of salmon and the second biggest fish exporter on the planet with yearly offers of more than £7bn, contrasted and the UK's £1bn.
He told an uncommon Brexit knowing about the Lords EU select board of trustees that the angling business was not restricted to imparting British waters to French or other European accomplices, however it would be "on our terms".
Bryce Stewart, a marine environmentalist and fisheries scientist, said Brexit could hurt exchanging relations, despite the fact that he said it was a chance to resolve issues in the greatly scrutinized basic fisheries strategy.
Most British fish winds up on remote tables while British buyers remain savagely faithful to assortments of fish not got by Britons, for example, cod.
Barry Deas, CEO of the National Federation of Fisherman's Organizations, said the angling amount framework has prompted some "gross abnormalities", with the UK winding up with 9% of the cod catch in the Channel and the French 84%.
He said he had no enthusiasm for an arrival to the biting cod wars between the UK and Iceland in the 1970s, yet Brexit offered a chance to leave "something that is broken".
He told the board: "We see various critical open doors: the primary one is a chance to move far from basic fisheries arrangement, which hasn't been secured in eminence, in that it is a brought together, one size fits all, sweeping measure.
"There has been acknowledgment by the commission [that angling arrangement does not suit everyone] but rather throughout the years has had a tendency to make unintended outcomes and obscured back streets. So it is with a lot of help inside getting segment that we have a chance to move far from that and plan something more customized for our armadas."
As per Armstrong, the imperfections in the EU angling strategy had their foundations in the legislative issues of joining the European Community in 1973. "Angling was viewed as superfluous and British waters were given to the EC as a major aspect of the promotion arrangements. It was a purposeful demonstration yet a demonstration of imprudence. Presently we have the chance to right it," he said.
English waters make up an immense swath of European angling domain outside the 12-mile avoidance zone along the bank of every part state. One contention for Brexit was that it would give the angling segment sole control of the waters.
In any case, neither angling alliance is looking for this, as fish – especially mackerel, herring and cod – are exceedingly portable. Rather, they need access courses of action to British waters controlled by necessities.
The House of Lords EU select board of trustees is social event confirmations on an extensive variety of issues to help it comprehend the multifaceted nature of Brexit arrangements.
Dubious arrangements to auction the Land Registry have been put on hold, while clergymen survey reactions to the administration's meeting.
The Queen's discourse in May incorporated a diagram of an area arranging charge, which the administration said would empower the privatization of the Land Registry, which keeps records on property possession in England and Wales.
Nonetheless, that component does not show up in the bill set to go before parliament on Wednesday.
An administration source said: "No choice has been gone up against the eventual fate of the Land Registry. A meeting on the Land Registry's future shut in May and we are precisely considering our reaction. It is just right that new pastors require some serious energy to take a gander at all their choices before settling on a choice."
The proposed £1bn offer of the Land Registry, which was declared on the eve of the Easter break, has pulled in feedback from a scope of gatherings, including specialists, media firms and the UK's opposition guard dog.
They cautioned that it could make it harder and all the more expensive to get to data, prompting an absence of straightforwardness over property possession. A request against the arrangements has been marked by 317,930 individuals.
The Land Registry keeps the official record of business and private area proprietorship in England and Wales, holding 24m titles for properties. Information is accessible to the overall population by means of quests at £3 each, and utilized by different associations to give a scope of administrations including house value files.
A letter from the MP for Tottenham, David Lammy, pulled in more than 60 marks from MPs over the political range. Lammy respected the news that the privatization had been dropped from the bill.
"This is an incredible triumph for Land Registry staff, campaigners and the general population and organizations who utilize the Land Registry's administrations. It is additionally uplifting news for straightforwardness and openness in our property market," he said.
"I am satisfied that the legislature has seen sense and chose to defer this confused privatization, yet this is not over yet. I approach the legislature to now formally report that they will be totally scrapping these arrangements."
The Public and Commercial Services union, which speaks to Land Registry representatives, said it didn't trust this was the end of the issue, and it is keeping on observing the circumstance.
Its general secretary, Mark Serwotka, said: "We demonstrated two years back, and again this time round, that auctioning off the Land Registry would be dumb and wrong, serving just privately owned businesses hoping to benefit from property holders' information.
"We respect the administration's delay, however the arrangement ought to be scrapped completely, never to see the light of day again, and the Land Registry ought to remain completely in broad daylight hands."
The Law Society respected the choice to postpone any deal, saying it was an indication that worries were being considered important.
"Privatizing the Land Registry would make a scopehttp://www.brownpapertickets.com/blogcomments/425615 of genuine dangers to this imperative bit of national base, which bolsters and guarantees the uprightness of property proprietorship in this nation," said the general public's leader, Robert Bourns.
"All ramifications must be completely considered before any choice on whether to offer is made."
Past arrangements to privatize the association in 2014 were dropped after the intercession of Vince Cable, the then business secretary.
No comments:
Post a Comment